Untranslatable is
a word often used to describe Racine ’s
plays, we are told in the program to Bell Shakespeare’s latest production, Phèdre. And
watching the play, part of me cannot help but wish it had stayed thus, however
much it hurts me to admit it. Based on the Greek myth of Phèdre, Racine ’s play is a
downward spiralling tragedy, much like Shakespeare’s own Macbeth and Hamlet, until
at the end, tragedy befalls everyone, and Theseus and Théramène are left to
pick up the pieces.
If Anna
Cordingely’s set was anything to go by, the production should’ve been
sumptuous. A decaying room, perhaps in a French palace, it consisted of an
elongated octagonal room with the front walls removed – stairs tiled in black
and white, six large windows at the rear, a ceiling with a hole smashed through
it (due to a god’s intervention, perhaps?), a chaise divan and two
similarly-upholstered chairs… a picture of faded elegance. The space was lit
effectively by Paul
Jackson in bolts of harsh fluorescence, gentle gold, and electric blue, and
added to the former grandeur of the play’s location. Kelly Ryall’s sound design
and ‘score’ were both effective in unsettling the audience from the opening
salvo of scratching susurrations to the final blackout, almost as if the gods somewhere were spinning
disks of thunder and lightning. It was used in scene breaks too, and in tiny
unobtrusive blurts when a character entered via the stairs, and though my
description of it sounds somewhat disparaging, it was one of the production’s
strongest points, and complemented the set in its depiction of a once-faded
decadence, something familiar now in disarray, beyond repair. However, when you
added the cast – headed by Catherine McClements as Phèdre – something inherently 'magical' disappeared.
I don’t know what it was
exactly that made it feel empty. Ted Hughes’ translation of Racine’s
Alexandrine couplets has been described as “muscular” and “bloody” by director
Peter Evans, and on the page it seems so – short, succinct sentences, very to
the point, yet harshly poetic; beautiful in a brutal way. But when spoken by
the cast, it sounded flat, like slabs of falling plaster crashing around you,
words swirling in the air like dust; phrases jump out at you, certainly, but
nothing seems to stick. The costumes, also by Anna Cordingley, while contemporary and
unobtrusive, tended to blend too much into the set itself – there was no
distinction between Hippolytus’ dark grey T-shirt and jeans and the black box
of the Playhouse’s bare walls. Peter Evans’ direction, too, seemed to lack the
robustness and muscularity with which he infused his Macbeth
and Julius Caesar for Bell
Shakespeare previously. His almost-trademark physical tics – borne out of
Meyerhold’s bodily alphabet of movement-based responses to the text – seemed incongruous
and ill-suited to Racine ’s
play. The play started with all the characters diversely arranged around the
set – some seated, others standing, some curled on chairs, others on the ground
or stairs – while Hippolytus and Théramène talked, to each other yet out to the
auditorium. Being a version of a Greek tragedy, there is the natural adherence
of characters to declaim or speak as a Chorus, and that is a given convention
which we accept and are prepared to run with; but as the first scene draws out
longer and longer, without any variation, one’s concentration and investment in
the performance style begins to wane. The cast too seemed to suffer from a
rigidity and staticness perhaps borne out of an interpretation of Meyerhold’s technique
or an influence of the Greek tragedy mode; there was very little movement
around the set for great swathes of text, or when they did move, it was around
in a small contained area. Hippolytus seemed too full of adolescent angst and
rage, Aricia too staid; Théramène, Ismène and Panope were barely seen on stage,
and Oenone seemed to be a sycophantic confidant to Phèdre (we are told she is
her nurse in the program), while it was Theseus with whom a breath of movement
and life was brought into the space. In his grey suit and closely cropped hair
and beard, he was perhaps the most unobtrusive of the cast, but his performance
tics of a Richard III-esque hunched-back-and-dropped-shoulder, a kind of
ape-like swagger as he wrought the vengeance of the gods upon his son seemed
misplaced for a king.
This all sounds a bit too
cruel, and it’s not easy to write this about one of Sydney ’s continually strong companies, but
perhaps the stars were not altogether aligned for this production, perhaps the
Fates had other ideas. I don’t think that there is anyone particularly to blame
for it either, it perhaps stems from the text itself perhaps as far back as Racine ’s version of 1677.
Phèdre is a hurricane, as destructive as she is “emotionally
incontinent,” yet through Racine-via-Hughes ’
dense slabs of prose, she comes across as often hysterical, singularly pitched
with no real variation or depth. Yes, she is a controlling and manipulative
character, that much is certainly evident, but as for her reasons why she did
what she did, it all gets a bit obfuscated and eventually we learn that it was
through sheer jealousy, though that does not excuse her behaviour at all.
Like Bell Shakespeare’s
delicious robust and Grand Guignol-esque production of Webster’s The
Duchess of Malfi last year, Phèdre
makes you realise just how resplendent and innately tuned to the human
condition Shakespeare was. “[Racine ]
was a genius,” McClements said in the Sydney
Morning Herald recently. “He was so disciplined. The French audiences must
have considered Shakespeare shambolic.” However ‘shambolic’ Shakespeare must
seem to the French – and just as untranslatable as Racine is to us – there is
still a gentle (and sometimes fierce) compassion to his works, a sense of
wonder and understanding and real-ness imbued within every line and character,
within every scene, sonnet, poem and play. While Phèdre and all the rest of them put their faith in the gods I, like
Shakespeare, choose to put my faith in humanity, and I think that’s a safe
place to be for now.
Theatre
playlist: 15. Zanstra,
Nick Cave & Warren Ellis
No comments:
Post a Comment